Co-ownership may assume
different forms. Its two chief kind in English law are distinguished
as ownership in common and joint ownership. The most crucial
differences between these relates to the results of death of one of
the co-owners. If ownership is common the right of a dead man
descends to his successors like other inheritable rights , but on the
dying of one of two joint owners , his ownership ends with him and
the survivor turns the sole owner by virtue of his right of
survivorship or jus accrescendi . If a property belongs to X and Y in
equal shares and if it is a case of ownership in common , half the
property will pass to the heir of X on his death and the other half
will remain with Y . However if the X and Y are joint owners Y would
be titled to the whole property and the heirs of X would get nothing.
Each owner in common are interested in a part or a share but not in
the whole of the property. Common ownership is familiar in Hindu law.
Joint ownership in the English law type is rather foreign to Hindu
law and the presumption usually made where the grantees are Hindus.
Is that they hold in common . The joint ownership is familiar to
Hindu is special kind of which the joint holding by the members of an
undivided Mitakshara joint family is the type. The distinguishing
feature of a Mitakshara coparcenary is the right of survivorship
possessed by its members. It resembles the joint tenancy of English
law . However, a Mitakshara coparcenary is liable to be enlarged by
the birth of a male issue copercenars . Invested with a right by
birth , the male issue also becomes a copecener .This feature is
absent in the joint ownership of English law.
No comments:
Post a Comment